Ensuring fairness for future generations requires policy decisions that are transparent, inclusive, and grounded in democratic principles. Yet recent developments raise concerns. The draft wine labelling package—currently under discussion—introduces major changes related to wine production and promotion, supported by substantial budgets. These measures are being advanced without public consultation or an impact assessment, despite significant implications for consumer rights and public health. Decisions of this nature should not be made behind closed doors.

Similar concerns apply to the Commission’s recent use of the “Omnibus process” to revise pesticide rules—another case where procedural shortcuts were taken, excluding meaningful engagement with civil society and experts. These patterns risk normalising opaque policymaking that favours short-term or vested interests. A strong, independent civil society is essential to ensuring that the long-term public interest is protected—especially in public health, where commercial influence can be considerable.

If policy decisions increasingly reflect short-term or narrow interests, future generations may inherit systems shaped without their needs or voices in mind. Intergenerational fairness also depends on how decisions are made—not just what is decided.

Addressing these issues is essential to building trust, upholding democratic principles, and protecting a civic space that future generations can rely on.